Khan 2In the beginning of march 2017, the director of CERI - SK Dr. Primož Repar atended the ceremony at the University of Constantine the Philosopher in Nitra (Slovakia) where prof. Abrahim Khan was awarded with the title Doctor honoris causa. Prof. Khan was involved in many activities of the CERI - SK institute and we congratulate him for the honor that he received.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Organizers: Publishing house KUD Apokalipsa and Central European Research Institute Soeren Kierkegaard Ljubljana
Coorganizer: Cankarjev dom

Škocjan, Trieste, Slovenia, Italy - from 2nd to 4th of September
Cankarjev dom, Ljubljana, Slovenia  - 5th to 6th of September


Topic: Courage to Act

This theme, inspired by Kierkegaard thinking, will be connected also with other selected personalities who could be valuable for reflection about our topic:
Dietrich Bonhoeffer (1906-1945), Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986), Václav Havel (1936-2011), Paul Tillich (1886-1965), and Andrej Tarkovski (1932-1986).

In the past two weeks the Slovenian culture scene has been shocked because of the hunger strike of the director of Zavod KSEVT Miha Turšič. We are receiving a lot of questions from Slovenia and abroad about the status of Slovenian culture. The Institute of Soeren Kierkegaard is following these events with concern, and in a large part all of this is the consequence of a well established practice of degrading the field of culture in Slovenia. Miha Turšič has summed up demands of his hunger strike in three points. The first two demands are connected directly to the problem concerning Zavod KSEVT and the third point is demanding that the national budget for culture be restored to a 2%, rather than a 0,4% reduction which is the case now. The Institute of Soeren Kierkegaard sees in the first two demands a symptom of the current inadequate handling of innovative cultural institutions in Slovenia. The third demand is in large part the cause of the first two, although not everything is connected to financial problems. There is also a problem in that the bureaucratic way of thinking is applied to fields in which it does not belong, and that is the field of creativity. Because of this we have decided to send a letter to the Government of the Republic of Slovenia, urging them to learn from the exposed case in order to understand the real situation from our perspective in the field of culture. We are also calling upon them not to allow the further destruction of culture, and especially not to push artists over the edge of their capabilities. In the attachment you will find the letter that we have sent to the Government of the Republic of Slovenia.

 

Odziv CERI

 

Translation:

 

Let us not become a society of extremes!

 

The decreasing support in the field of culture is ever more disturbing. Due to the recent reduction in the national budget for culture as many organizations pointed out, the support we have had is on the brink of collapse. We see the hunger strike of Miha Turšič as an almost inevitable step, and the situation in the culture center KSEVT is just a reflection of many similar problems affecting Slovenian culture, humanities and art. The Institute of Soeren Kierkegaard has also become a target of bureaucratic entanglements and blackmailing from local authorities, and we are asking ourselves which national institution can we rely on and trust to help us resolve our disputes in a rational and dialogical way. In the actual paradigmatic case it is not clear why it has come to such drastic measures, and why we cannot work together to resolve our differences in a cultivated and tolerant way. After the protest session of the National Council for Culture of the Republic of Slovenia, its petition and many letters of support, the budget for culture received a smaller budget reduction than previously predicted. There seems to be a trend that politicians detect only extreme measures, and these practices are followed by other bureaucrats. We have received many questions of concern from our international partners, but sadly we cannot say to them that the problem is of minor consequence. The problems, long-standing and urgent, need to be addressed holistically.

This is why we see the decision of Miha Turšič as a final warning that the depletion, neglecting and accusing of culture has gone too far. Therefore we call upon all responsible that they resolve the exposed situation and at the same time rethink the future systematic steps of the dialogue with culture producers. We have many mechanisms for cooperation, and we can use and respect them together or we risk becoming a barbaric society that communicates only though extreme situations. And culture is the main tool to prevent this from happening. We most sincerely hope that you will understand.

 

EMILY MARTONE: (Un)politics of Friendship and Mourning

 

This paper aims to investigate the question of community in Kierkegaard's thought, comparing it with Montaigne's concept of political friendships and Derrida’s policies of friendship. In order to highlight the possible connections between the concepts of friendship and of the political, I will discuss the way in which the three authors deal with two strictly interconnected themes: friendship and mourning. Following the Aristotelian-Ciceronian lesson on philia and the reading of his friend Etienne de la Boetie, Montaigne stresses the political dimension of friendship. He merges the classic criteria of similarity, equality and reciprocity with the grounding moment of a free and voluntary choice that constitutes individuals in confrérie. According to Montaigne, the decision is the political category of friendship, which in turn constitutes the microscopic level of society and the critical fault in the human tendency towards voluntary servitude. In Politics of Friendship, Derrida deconstructs the metaphysical tradition that had seen the basis of the political in friendship. Contrary to Montaigne, Derrida sees the typical characteristics of political friendship along with its possible degenerative outcomes. The political shifts towards a familiar configuration based on a naturalist assumption: family, state, nation, are intertwined with the myth of earth and blood. The political then is grounded on friendship that finds its condition of possibility in the dialectical suspension of enmity and therefore in the Schmittean couple Friend/Enemy. Montaigne’s saying, “O my friends, there is no friend”, becomes inseparable from the Nietzschean one: “Enemies, there are no enemies”. However, Derrida envisages the possibility of a friendship as unpolitical phenomenon and identifies it in the mourning-surviving relationship always present in friendship. Kierkegaard offers an alternative critical reading to the two previous interpretations: he describes friendship in Montaigne's terms and then shares it with love in their being preferential bonds. Since a friend is chosen because he corresponds to the classical criteria of friendship, his otherness is lost and the relationship is narrowed down to a narcissistic doubling of the ego. The more two egos become one by merging themselves, the greater the latter unified ego distances itself from the others outside the relationship. Since friendship as social cell is created in such an exclusive and excluding manner, Kierkegaard describes – ahead of his time – the whole political as intrinsically narcissistic. Enten-Eller's Symparanekromenoi, a congregation of the dead (such as the friendships between Lelio and Cicero, La Boetie and Montaigne) is the exemplum of isolation and camaraderie that characterize modern society. To these preferential bonds, Kierkegaard opposes neighbour-love and a model of Christian community as viable alternative to the paradigm of political theology. The category of neighbour suspends the difference between friend and enemy and thus proves to be absolutely unpolitical. At the same time, it opens up to a type of social bond, emblematically represented by loving the deceased, which replaces the construction of a common identity based on the resemblance (society), with the mutual openness to others that is at the same time a kenotic exposure and expropriation of one’s ego (community).

7th International Philosophical Symposium of Miklavž Ocepek
»Under the honorary patronage of President of the Republic of Slovenia, Mr. Borut Pahor«

In cooperation with Cankarjev dom and Development and information center Bela krajina (RIC)

Søren Kierkegaard 2019

7th International conference and workshop

Primostek pri Metliki (Big Berry Resort), Ljubljana, 13. 5 – 17. 5. 2019

Organisation: KUD Apokalipsa Publishing House and Central European Research Institute Søren Kierkegaard Ljubljana

In collaboration with Cankarjev dom and others.

Primostek pri Metliki (Big Berry Resort), Slovenia – from 13th to 15th of May 2019

Cankarjev dom, Ljubljana, Slovenia – 16st and 17nd of May 2019

Theme: EXISTENTIALISM AND POSSIBILITY OF NEW POLICIES IN THE WORLD

 

In the world in which we live, more than ever, we need dialogue between the various thinkers and those who thinks differently, who will nourish the pluralism of ideas and beliefs in the direction of spiritual openness. At the 7th Symposium of the Miklavž Ocepek, we want to stimulate the dialogue between those who thinks differently in the world, which is why Rosa Luxemburg's move in existentialism and her thoughts of the spontaneity of the revolution, which is fundamentally existential, has shown Simone Weil in fact also philosophically with her own example. We are talking about the existential turn of The Single Individual. This existential revolution gives the dimension of existential communication and constant reinterpretation a new dimension, which is added by the thought of Karl Jaspers. In order to achieve this, however, we need a citizen's conciliation in order to greet wounds that are deep. The basis for the options for this dialogue is a conversation without condemnation!

This theme, inspired by Kierkegaard thinking, will be connected with:

KARL JASPERS (1883–1969), ROSA LUXEMBURG (1871–1919), SIMONE WEIL (1909–1943) and first independent journal in ex-Yugoslavia 2000 (1969)


Monday, 13. 5. 2019

 

13:00 BAZA 20 (INTRODUCTION BAZA 21)


Primostek pri Metliki (Big Berry Resort)
https://www.bigberry.eu/en/destinations/kolpa-river-slovenia/about-resort/


16:30
Arrival and accomodation of participants


18:00
Opening Ceremony


19:00
Dinner


20:00
Literary evening Ljubomir Djurković (MNE)

Tuesday, 14. 5. 2019
PRIMOSTEK PRI METLIKI
Wednesday, 15.5.2019
PRIMOSTEK PRI METLIKI
Thursday, 16. 5. 2019
LJUBLJANA
Friday, 17. 5. 2019 LJUBLJANA

8:30, Big Berry Resort

Breakfast with philosophy

Jelena Djurić (SRB), Judit Bartha (H)

(anchored by Jasna Koteska + mutual communication)

8:30, Big Berry Resort

Breakfast with philosophy

Ouyang Kang (CHINA),

Thomas Diesner (GER),

Kristian Guttesen (IS)

(anchored by Uroš Milić and Gašper Pirc + mutual communication)

9:00 Departure to Ljubljana

CANKARJEV DOM
M1 hall

9:30, Big Berry Resort


Philosophical workshop

Workshop CERI SK

Igor Krajnc:

STRUCTURE AND GOALS

– 1st part


13:00 Lunch

 

15:00 Big Berry Resort

Workshop CERI SK

Igor Krajnc:

STRUCTURE AND GOALS

– 2nd part

10:00, Big Berry Resort


Workshop CERI SK

 

Primož Turk,

Andrej Marković (SLO):

Politics (Aristoteles and Oikonomia)

 

(anchored by Igor Tavilla)

12:00 International exhibition of philosophical publications

 

 

 

 

 

 

FREE AFTERNOON

CANKARJEV DOM

Kosovelova hall

12:00 Conference opening

 

12:15 Alastair Hannay (N)

DISCUSSION

12:30 Karel Gržan (SLO)

DISCUSSION

13:00 Jasna Koteska (MK)


DISCUSSION

13:30 Primož Repar (SLO)

DISCUSSION

15:00 PLENARY LECTURE
(Discussion with T. Menamparampil will be moderated by journalist Ervin Hladnik Milharčič)

Thomas Menamparampil (INDIA)

DISCUSSION

16:00 Abrahim H. Khan (CAN)

DISCUSSION

16:30 Nadezhda Gonotskaya (SLO)

DISCUSSION

17:00 Žarko Paić (CRO)

DISCUSSION

17:30 Janko Rožič (SLO)

DISCUSSION

10:00 Bojan Žalec (SLO)

DISCUSSION

10:30 Cvetka Tóth (SLO)

DISCUSSION

11:00 Paula Arizpe (MX)

DISCUSSION

11:30 Ouyang Kang (CHINA)

DISCUSSION

15:00 SECTION OF PSYCHOANALYSIS

Thomas Diesner (GER), Eva D. Bahovec, Tomaž Herga, Anže Okorn, Ana Jereb (SLO)

DISCUSSION

16:30 Andrej Ule (SLO)

DISCUSSION

 



16:
00

Different panels:

Philosophical lecture

Presentation of the theme of the symposium (15 minutes):


Registered participants!

Thomas Menamparampil (INDIA), Peter Kovačič Peršin, Darko Štrajn, Ciril Klajnšček, Iztok Osojnik, Gašper Pirc, Janez Vodičar, Bogomir Novak, Uroš Milić, Marko Vitas (all SLO), Pia Søltoft (DK), Kristian Guttesen (IS), Igor Tavilla (I), Judith Barta (H), Dalimir Hajko, Peter Kondrla (SK), Samuel Odachi (NGR),

Joca Zurc (JAP/SLO), Jelena Djurić (SRB)


(anchored by
Darko Štrajn, Jasna Koteska and Igor Tavilla)



18:00

Presentation of books

Žarko Paić: Spheres of existence(monography)

Dalimir Hajko: Kierkegaard in Contemporary Indian Philosophical Thinking

(monography)

S. Kierkegaard: Two Ages

(Slovene translation)

CONCLUDING ROUND TABLE /quiz

18:30 Philosophical symposium in conference

In vino veritas 2:

Introduction by Abrahim H. Khan


(round table/philosophical quiz: 10 participants; directed by Niko Goršić; )

RAP MUSIC: Mihajlo Milić

BEST SPEAKERS WILL BE AWARDED BY International Commission:
Marko Vitas (SLO),

Eva Marija Opresnik,

Eric Jacobsen (DEN)

21:00, Big Berry Resort

POETRY-IMAGE-VOICE

Kristian Guttesen (IS),

H. O. Vilaseñor (MX)

(anchored by Primož Repar)

21:00, Big Berry Resort POETRY-IMAGE-VOICE

Jasna Koteska (MAC),

Ljubomir Djurković (MNE)

H. O. Vilaseñor (MX)

(anchored by Iztok Osojnik)

  TREAT AND CONCLUDING PARTY
     
ACCOMPANYING EVENTS

 

Photographic
projections, Art photography by Bojan Stepančič (DVD projection, Conferences 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018)

Philosophy
Theology
CULTURE
Philosophy
Theology
CULTURE
Philosophy
Theology
CULTURE
Philosophy
Theology
CULTURE